Legal Opinion
Daimlerchrysler Corp. v. Cox
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 23, 2006No. 05-1716PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RONALD LEE GILMAN, Circuit Judge.
This is a case of first impression in this circuit, involving the question of whether Michigan’s State Correctional Facility Reimbursement Act (SCFRA), in conjunction with other Michigan laws and with directives from the Michigan Department of Corrections (MDOC), runs afoul of the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) in cases where prisoners refuse to inform their pension plans of a change of address. The combined effect of the Michigan laws requires wardens to notify pension plans that they should send the prisoner’s benefit payments…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Patterson v. ShumateSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Boggs v. BoggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Scottsdale Insurance v. FlowersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Estate of Kensinger v. URL Pharma, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- State Treasurer v. SpragueMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
- MetLife and Annuity Company of Connecticut v. Uzo AkpeleCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
- In re Estate of Lucien CoutureSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.