Legal Opinion
United States v. Zermeno
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 25, 1995No. Nos. 94-50622, 94-50624PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge:
The government appeals the district court’s order granting the motions of defendants-appellees Felipe Zermeno, Ramon Flores-Rivas and Guillermo Silva-Sosa (collectively “defendants”) to suppress evidence found pursuant to a search of a “stash house.” The government claims the district court erred in ruling that Zermeno and Silva-Sosa have standing to challenge the search, that the search warrant was over-broad, and that the agents executing the warrant failed to comply with the “knock and announce” requirement of 18 U.S.C. § 3109.
We have jurisdiction under 28…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. SalvucciSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Hector Martin RamosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- United States v. William Joseph KirkCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Mario Silva, Jorge Zepeda-Medrano, and Alejandro Aguilar-EspinozaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Way Quoe LongCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. $40,955.00 in United States CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Willie Russell, Jr., A/K/A Wild BillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.