United States v. Mario Silva, Jorge Zepeda-Medrano, and Alejandro Aguilar-Espinoza
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GRABER, Circuit Judge:
Defendants Mario Silva, Jorge Zepeda-Medrano, and Alejandro Aguilar-Espinoza challenge their convictions. They contend that the district court erred in denying their motions to suppress evidence gathered by police during an investigation of a conspiracy to manufacture and distribute methamphetamine. For the reasons dis cussed below, we hold that the police did not violate the Fourth Amendment when they searched the buildings in question. We remand the case, however, because the district court failed to rule on the validity of the search of Defendants’ persons.
FACTUAL AND…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Tollett v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Minnesota v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Minnesota v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- United States v. Kevin Joseph BautistaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. James Manuel BanuelosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Tomi Mann, United States of America v. James F. PollenderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Reyes-BosqueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Frank Jimenez-Dominguez, A.K.A. Ramon Santos, A.K.A. Frank Martin Jimenez, A.K.A. Frank Jimenez, A.K.A. Frank Dominquez JimenezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.