United States v. Willie Russell, Jr., A/K/A Wild Bill
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge.
This case requires us to consider whether the emergency doctrine or implied consent can support a warrantless search of a home on suspicion that a 9-1-1 caller or lurking predator was inside.
I
On Saturday, December 23, 2003, Willie Russell, Jr., placed two calls to the Sacramento Sheriffs Office (SSO) 9-1-1 dispatcher. In the first emergency call, Russell identified himself as “Gregory Hines,” and explained to the operator that a gun went off and hit him in the foot, that he was wounded and in pain, and that he wanted the dispatcher to call an ambulance. The…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Alfred Arnold AmelineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- People v. MitchellNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- United States v. Isidro Moreno-HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Hopkins v. BonvicinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Chelsey Hayes v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- State v. MeeksTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
- United States v. StruckmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- State v. NeighborsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.