Legal Opinion

Gordon v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 20, 2013No. 43PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdkins, J.

In order to convict Michael Gordon of third-degree sex offense, the State had to prove that he was at least twenty-one years old at the time he had the alleged inappropriate contact ■with a fourteen-year-old girl. The State sought to do that through the testimony of a police officer who had an opportunity to examine Gordon’s driver’s license and to see the date of birth listed there. Gordon objected to that testimony on hearsay grounds, but the State argued that, even if the date of birth was hearsay, it was admissible as an adoptive admission of a party-opponent under Maryland Rule…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. State v. SaucierSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  2. State v. CarlsonOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Molesworth v. BrandonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  4. Young v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Henry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Hailes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  2. State v. GaliciaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  3. Bartlett v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  4. Lopez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  5. Wheeler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API