Legal Opinion
Bartlett v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided May 19, 2014No. 64/13PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GREENE J.
In these consolidated “debt buyer” small claim actions,1 we must determine whether the plaintiffs are permitted to satisfy their respective burdens of proof to establish liability and damages on the basis of hearsay evidence. Both cases origi*261nated in the District Court of Maryland sitting in Baltimore City. The plaintiffs filed small claim actions for money damages and demanded judgment on affidavit at the time of filing the complaint commencing the actions. Md. Rule 3-306 (“Judgment on Affidavit”); Md. Rule 3-701 (“Small Claim Actions”). The defendants filed timely notices of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- North v. NorthCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Nesbit v. Government Employees InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Dehn v. EdgecombeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- J.L. Matthews, Inc. v. Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Stratton v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
- Spaw, LLC v. City of AnnapolisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
- Dolan v. Kemper Independence Ins. Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2018
- ARTHUR J. MORBURGER v. J. REPORTING, INC., etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.