Legal Opinion

Hailes v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 17, 2015No. 62/14PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWatts, J.

We decide: (I) whether the State may appeal from a trial court’s exclusion of intangible evidence based on a determination that the evidence’s admission would be a constitutional violation; if so, (II) whether, here, a declarant made a dying declaration two years before dying; and, if so, (III) whether the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution is applicable to dying declarations.

We hold that: (I) the State may appeal from a trial court’s exclusion of intangible evidence based on a determination that the evidence’s admission would be a constitutional…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Leon Davis, Jr. v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2016
  2. Leon Davis, Jr. v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2016
  3. Varriale v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  4. State v. GaliciaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  5. Harold Bishop v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API