Legal Opinion

CHAVEZ

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 2007No. ID 3578PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cite as

24 I&N Dec. 272

(BIA 2007) Interim Decision #3578 In re Gildardo CHAVEZ-Martinez, Respondent File A37 731 348 - Chicago Decided August 31, 2007 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) An alien seeking to reopen proceedings to establish that a conviction has been vacated bears the burden of proving that the conviction was not vacated solely for immigration purposes. (2) Where the respondent presented no evidence to prove that his conviction was not vacated solely for immigration purposes, he failed to meet his burden of showing…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. AbuduSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. COELHOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1992
  3. PICKERINGBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2003
  4. ANSELMOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1989
  5. Christopher Pickering v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Arturo Andrade-Zamora v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  2. Sarbjit Singh v. Jefferson B. Sessions IIICourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  3. AZRAGBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2024
  4. Brenda Torres v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  5. DE JESUS PLATONBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2025

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API