Legal Opinion
AZRAG
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided February 23, 2024No. ID 4073PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
28 I&N Dec. 784
(BIA 2024) Interim Decision #4073 Matter of Mogtabi Hassan AZRAG, Respondent Decided February 23, 2024 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals Where a State court order granting a respondent’s motion to vacate a conviction does not indicate the reason for the vacatur, and there is no other basis in the record to independently establish the reason, the respondent has not satisfied his burden to show that the court vacated his conviction because of a substantive or procedural defect in his criminal proceedings. FOR…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- PICKERINGBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2003
- Christopher Pickering v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Nath v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- THOMAS and THOMPSONBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2019
- Rumierz v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- DE JESUS PLATONBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2025