Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Security Building Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 1, 1924PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
The defendant in its appeal assigns errors on the part of the Superior Court in failing to grant certain motions to correct the finding of the Commissioner; also that the court erred in holding that under the subordinate facts the injuries complained of by the plaintiff “arose out of his employment.”
As to the matter of correcting the finding, we deem it unnecessary to consider the reasons of appeal relating thereto, because if the corrections were made as requested they would not affect the award.
There was no controversy that the plaintiff was in the employ of the defendant on October 31st,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Powers v. Hotel Bond Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
- Claim of Katz v. A. Kadans & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Jacquemin v. Turner & Seymour Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1918
- Marchiatello v. Lynch Realty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
- John H. Kaiser Lumber Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
3Cited by27 opinions
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. CardilloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- Howard v. Harwood's Restaurant Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Hildebrand v. . Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Hegler v. Cannon Mills Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Cedar Rapids Community School v. CadySupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.