State v. Munoz
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.
Ramiro P. Munoz appeals his conviction of one count of delivery of a controlled substance, cocaine. The issue is whether the trial court's procedure in permitting juror questions'violated the defendant's constitutional rights to a fair trial by an unbiased jury and to effective assistance of counsel, and whether the procedure was improper rule-making. We find that the issue was not properly preserved and does not raise constitutional concerns that would merit our consideration absent an objection below. We therefore affirm.
I
The trial court made opening remarks to the jury as follows:
Now, many…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. LordWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Bennett v. HardyWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- DeBenedetto v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Alvin E. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- State v. ZimaNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. FisherOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- Commonwealth v. BrittoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- State v. CulkinHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. HaysSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
- Medina v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.