Legal Opinion

State v. Munoz

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 27, 1992No. 27290-0-IPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.

Ramiro P. Munoz appeals his conviction of one count of delivery of a controlled substance, cocaine. The issue is whether the trial court's procedure in permitting juror questions'violated the defendant's constitutional rights to a fair trial by an unbiased jury and to effective assistance of counsel, and whether the procedure was improper rule-making. We find that the issue was not properly preserved and does not raise constitutional concerns that would merit our consideration absent an objection below. We therefore affirm.

I

The trial court made opening remarks to the jury as follows:

Now, many…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. LordWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Bennett v. HardyWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. DeBenedetto v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  4. United States v. Alvin E. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  5. State v. ZimaNebraska Supreme Court · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. FisherOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Commonwealth v. BrittoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  3. State v. CulkinHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. HaysSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  5. Medina v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API