Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Chattanooga General Services Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1981PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DROWOTA, Justice.

This is a worker’s compensation case wherein the defendants, the employer and *381insurance carrier, assert that the Chancellor erred in three respects, two of which will be treated herein.

Plaintiff, her daughter Lynn, and Lynn’s friend, Susan Owens, went together to several businesses to apply for jobs. One of these was defendant, Chattanooga General Services, and another was Salem Carpet Mills. Plaintiff, who had forgotten her glasses, asked Lynn to fill out the application forms for her, and told her what to write in. Defendant was not hiring, so plaintiff accepted a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Federal Copper & Aluminum Company v. DickeyTennessee Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Phillips v. Fleetguard Division of Cummins Engine Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Haddix v. Day & Night Manufacturing Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Renee Purtle v. Eldridge Auto Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  2. Oesterreich v. Canton-Inwood HospitalSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Beasley v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Sampson v. WELLMONT HEALTH SYSTEMCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2007
  5. Raines v. Shelby Williams Industries, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API