Legal Opinion

Federal Copper & Aluminum Company v. Dickey

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1973PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHATTIN, Justice.

Plaintiff was employed on August 2, 1971, and on August 11, 1971, while cleaning up oil at the defendant’s plant, slipped and injured his back. As a result thereof, he brought this action for workmen’s compensation benefits.

In its answer to the petition, defendant alleged plaintiff falsified his application for employment which was material to the employment and of the essence to his employment by defendant.

Defendant insists the trial judge erred in awarding benefits to plaintiff because his claim was barred by the misrepresentation of his physical condition upon his…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Martin Company v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Florida · 1961
  2. Air Mod Corporation v. NewtonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
  3. Volunteers of America of Madison, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  4. General Motors Corporation v. HargisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  5. Phillips v. Fleetguard Division of Cummins Engine Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Dressler v. Grand Rapids Die Casting Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. TaylorTennessee Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Georgia Electric Co. v. RycroftSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
  4. Goldstine v. Jensen Pre-CastNevada Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Martinez v. Driver Mechenbier, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API