Legal Opinion

Beasley v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1985PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DROWOTA, Justice.

In this Workers’ Compensation appeal the determinative issue is whether the Plaintiffs failure to disclose a pre-existing back injury bars recovery under the Workers’ Compensation Law. The trial court denied Plaintiff’s claim based on its findings that the Plaintiff had knowingly and wilfully misrepresented his physical condition to Defendant’s insured, who relied upon Plaintiff’s representations, and that a causal relation existed between the condition misrepresented and the injury sustained by the Plaintiff.

The Plaintiff, Thomas Beasley, applied for employment with…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Swift & Co. v. HowardTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Federal Copper & Aluminum Company v. DickeyTennessee Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. TaylorTennessee Supreme Court · 1979
  4. White v. Whiteway Pharmacy, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1962
  5. American Enka Corporation v. SuttonTennessee Supreme Court · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McDaniel v. Colonial Mechanical Corp.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1986
  2. Ex Parte Southern Energy Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  3. Sanchez v. Memorial General HospitalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. EdwardsTennessee Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Rowland v. Carriers Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API