Legal Opinion
Hinckley v. Kelsey-Hayes Co.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided November 3, 1994No. Civ. A. 93-74537PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
GADOLA, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction pursuant to Rule 65(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiffs represent a proposed class of individuals seeking relief under the Labor Management Relations Act (“LMRA”), 29 U.S.C. § 185, and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1132, from defendant Kelsey-Hayes Company for breach of a collective bargaining agreement and a welfare benefit plan. 1 For the reasons…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (Uaw), and Local 134, Uaw v. Yard-Man, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Robert L. Musto v. American General CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- In Re Delorean Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Lawrence Roth v. Bank of the CommonwealthCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- Mason County Medical Ass'n v. KnebelCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- David Adams v. Freedom Forge CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- City of Pontiac Retired Employees v. Louis SchimmelCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Adams v. Freedom Forge Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Fox v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1995
- Risteen v. Youth for Understanding, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.