Legal Opinion
City of Pontiac Retired Employees v. Louis Schimmel
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 5, 2014No. 12-2087PublishedCited by 171 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The Court delivered a per curiam order. McKEAGUE, J. (pp. 433-34), delivered a separate concurrence, in which BATCHELDER, C.J., joined.
ORDER
2Per curiam
Legal, factual, and equitable considerations have developed significantly since the district court denied the plaintiffs’ request for a preliminary injunction almost two years ago. In light of these developments, we vacate the district court’s denial of injunctive relief and remand for further proceedings.
I. BACKGROUND
The basic facts of this case are set out in the panel’s majority and dissenting opinions. See City of Pontiac Retired Emps. Ass’n v.…
3Cases cited18 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Northeastern Florida Chapter of the Associated General Contractors of America v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Leary v. DaeschnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by171 opinions
- Craig Wilson v. Mark WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Puckett v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County GovernmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- American Civil Liberties Union Fund v. Livingston CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Kentucky v. United States Ex Rel. HangelCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- John Doe v. Univ. of CincinnatiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
166 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.