Legal Opinion
Risteen v. Youth for Understanding, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 12, 2002No. CIV.A.02-0709 (JBD)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BATES, District Judge.
Before the Court is plaintiff Paul Risteen’s motion seeking a preliminary injunction against defendants Youth for Understanding, Inc. (‘YFU”) and Youth for Understanding USA, Inc. (‘YFU USA”) to enjoin them from denying him continuation health insurance coverage under the Employment Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1140 et seq., as amended by the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (“COBRA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1161 et seq. Risteen, a former employee of YFU, alleges that YFU USA is the successor employer to YFU following YFU’s…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission v. Holiday Tours, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- National Labor Relations Board v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Golden State Bottling Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Carabillo v. ULLICO Inc. Pension Plan and TrustDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Adair v. EnglandDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Penland v. MabusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Gilliard v. McWilliamsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Preite v. Charles of the Ritz Group, Ltd. Pension PlanDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.