Legal Opinion

TCG Detroit v. City of Dearborn

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided August 14, 1998No. 96-CV-74338-DTPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ZATKOFF, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment, filed by all of the parties, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. Responses and replies have been filed. The Court finds that the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the parties’ briefs and the decisional process would not be significantly aided by oral argument. Therefore, pursuant to E.D. Mich. Local R. 7.1(e)(2), it is hereby ORDERED that the motions be resolved on the briefs submitted. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs motion is…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. BFP v. Resolution Trust CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic-Maryland, Inc. v. Prince George's CountyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1999
  2. City of Gary v. Indiana Bell Telephone Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2000
  3. TCG New York, Inc. v. City of White Plains, NYDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
  4. Qwest Corp. v. City of Santa Fe, New MexicoDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2002
  5. Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc. v. City of OrangeburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API