Legal Opinion

City of Gary v. Indiana Bell Telephone Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 2000No. 45S03-0006-CV-393PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION TO TRANSFER

SULLIVAN, Justice.

Ameritech Indiana sought declaratory and injunctive relief to prevent the City of Gary from imposing a “requirements-based fee” on telecommunications providers using City .rights-of-way. The trial court declared the fee void as an improper tax issued beyond the City’s powers. We reverse in part, finding that the City was initially entitled to charge compensation for the private, commercial use of its real estate, until the legislature affirmatively said otherwise.

*152 Background

On January 6, 1998, the City of Gary enacted Ordinance Nos. 6970 & 6971, which…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Far East Conference v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Commonwealth Edison Co. v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Evansville-Vanderburgh Airport Authority District v. Delta Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. St. Louis v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Perry v. Stitzer Buick GMC, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1994

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Rheem Manufacturing Co. v. Phelps Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. City of North Vernon v. Jennings Northwest Regional UtilitiesIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Stacy Knighten v. East Chicago Housing Authority, Individually and d/b/a West Calumet Complex, Davis Security Service, LLC, and Donnell CaldwellIndiana Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Smith v. Delta Tau Delta, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Alva Electric, Inc. v. Evansville-Vanderburgh School Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 2014

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API