Legal Opinion
Winkler-Koch Engineering Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co. (Delaware)
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 11, 1946PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRIGHT, District Judge.
This action is brought under section 4 of the Clayton Act, 38 Stat. 731, 15 U.S. C.A. § 15, to recover treble damages for an alleged violation of the Sherman Act. The defendants Universal Oil Products Company of Delaware, Standard Oil Company of California, and Standard Oil Company of Indiana, move for an order declaring that service of process upon each of them is a nullity, that this court is without jurisdiction over them, and that the venue in this district is improper, none of them being an inhabitant, or found, or transacting business here. Universal also contends…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Green v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- People's Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Goldlawr, Incorporated v. ShubertDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
- Friends of Animals, Inc. v. American Veterinary Medical Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- Winkler-Koch Engineering Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951
- Dolly Toy Co. v. Bancroft-Rellim Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951
- Harry Brandt, D/B/A University City House of Liquors v. Renfield Importers, Ltd., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.