AM General Corp. v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.
District Court, N.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MILLER, Chief Judge.
General Motors seeks summary judgment on the trademark infringement counterclaims that DaimlerChrysler brought against it for using a vertically-slotted grille in the H2. The crux of GM’s argument is that DaimlerChrysler is foreclosed as a matter of law — the law created by this court in its preliminary injunction ruling and the law of the contract — from challenging GM’s use of the grille. Daimler- Chrysler rejects the notion that the court’s ruling at the preliminary injunction stage is a proper basis for summary judgment and renews its arguments…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Lionel Bordelon v. Chicago School Reform Board of TrusteesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Firefighters Local Union No. 1784 v. StottsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Sheila Ritchie v. Glidden Company, Ici Paints World-Group and Graco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Haggblom v. City of DillinghamAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
- Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. EngidaDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2008
- Haggblom v. City of DillinghamAlaska Supreme Court · 2008