Legal Opinion

AM General Corp. v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided February 25, 2003No. 3:01-cv-00134PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MILLER, Chief Judge.

General Motors seeks summary judgment on the trademark infringement counterclaims that DaimlerChrysler brought against it for using a vertically-slotted grille in the H2. The crux of GM’s argument is that DaimlerChrysler is foreclosed as a matter of law — the law created by this court in its preliminary injunction ruling and the law of the contract — from challenging GM’s use of the grille. Daimler- Chrysler rejects the notion that the court’s ruling at the preliminary injunction stage is a proper basis for summary judgment and renews its arguments…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Lionel Bordelon v. Chicago School Reform Board of TrusteesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  4. Firefighters Local Union No. 1784 v. StottsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Sheila Ritchie v. Glidden Company, Ici Paints World-Group and Graco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Haggblom v. City of DillinghamAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. EngidaDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2008
  3. Haggblom v. City of DillinghamAlaska Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API