Haggblom v. City of Dillingham
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
191 P.3d 991 (2008)
Lisa HAGGBLOM, Appellant,
v.
CITY OF DILLINGHAM, Appellee.
No. S-12358.
Supreme Court of Alaska.
August 29, 2008.
Susan Mitchell, Bristol Bay Law Center, LLC, Dillingham, for Appellant.
Krista S. Stearns, Boyd, Chandler & Falconer, LLP, Anchorage, for Appellee.
Before: FABE, Chief Justice, MATTHEWS, EASTAUGH, and CARPENETI, Justices.
OPINION
CARPENETI, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
A Dillingham ordinance provides that any animal that bites a person without provocation shall be deemed vicious and, after quarantine, shall be euthanized. A Dillingham dog owner whose dog bit a co-worker without…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Schick v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Richardson v. Fairbanks North Star BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.