Legal Opinion

Haggblom v. City of Dillingham

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 2008No. S-12358Published

1Opinion of the Court

191 P.3d 991 (2008)

Lisa HAGGBLOM, Appellant,

v.

CITY OF DILLINGHAM, Appellee.

No. S-12358.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

August 29, 2008.

Susan Mitchell, Bristol Bay Law Center, LLC, Dillingham, for Appellant.

Krista S. Stearns, Boyd, Chandler & Falconer, LLP, Anchorage, for Appellee.

Before: FABE, Chief Justice, MATTHEWS, EASTAUGH, and CARPENETI, Justices.

OPINION

CARPENETI, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

A Dillingham ordinance provides that any animal that bites a person without provocation shall be deemed vicious and, after quarantine, shall be euthanized. A Dillingham dog owner whose dog bit a co-worker without…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Schick v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Richardson v. Fairbanks North Star BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1985

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API