Legal Opinion

VanCleve v. Sparks

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 28, 2004No. 25776PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NANCY STEFFEN RAHMEYER, Chief Judge.

Wanna VanCleve and Thomas VanCleve (collectively, “Respondents”) filed a petition against Dale and Patricia Sparks (collectively, “Appellants”) seeking a declaratory judgment allowing Respondents to install speed bumps on an ingress and egress easement shared by the parties. The trial court granted the declaratory judgment and permanently enjoined Appellants, the owners of the dominant estate, from removing, altering, or destroying two speed bumps of no more than four inches in height constructed by Respondents. On appeal, Appellants argue the trial court…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Wallace v. Van PeltMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Stotzenberger v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  4. Harris v. DeSistoMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Searcy v. SeedorffSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dianne v. WingateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  2. Jackson v. CannonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Capital Bank v. BarnesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Daniele v. Missouri Department of ConservationMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Anthony J. Giger v. Joshua L. HogueIndiana Court of Appeals · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API