Legal Opinion
Jackson v. Cannon
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided October 28, 2004No. 25647, 25775PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JEFFREY W. BATES, Chief Judge.
Betty Jackson (“Jackson”) sued Charlotte Cannon (“Cannon”) and Sharon Simpkins (“Simpkins”) for allegedly breaching a retail installment sales contract to purchase a used automobile. Judgment was entered against Jackson on her claim after a bench trial, and she appealed.
I. Standard of Review
Our review of this court-tried case is governed by Rule 84.13(d). 1 We must affirm the trial court’s judgment unless it is not supported by substantial evidence, it is against the weight of the evidence, or it erroneously declares or applies the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Greer v. Zurich Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
- Metro Auto Auction v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
- Jackson v. Charlie's Chevrolet, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- Kearney Commercial Bank v. PopejoyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bolt v. GiordanoMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- Surrey Condominium Ass'n, Inc. v. WebbMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- Kenneth Ferguson v. Curators of Lincoln University, In Their Official Capacities, a/k/a Lincoln UniversityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- Meyers v. JohnsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- Jackson v. Hazelrigg Automotive Service Center, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.