Legal Opinion
Daniele v. Missouri Department of Conservation
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided April 7, 2009No. ED 90560PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
In this consolidated appeal, Anthony and Beth Daniele appeal the judgment of the trial court granting the Missouri Department of Conservation’s motion for a directed verdict on the Danieles’ claim for breach of contract. The Department cross-appeals the judgment of the trial court granting the Danieles’ motion for a directed verdict on the Department’s counterclaims for breach of contract and trespass. We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.
First, we find that the trial court did not err in entering its judgment granting the Department’s motion for a directed verdict on the…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- Carter v. St. John's Regional Medical CenterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- Dierkes v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
- Intertel, Inc. v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- McMullin v. BorgersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- Daniels v. Board of CuratorsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by6 opinions
- Kershaw v. City of Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- Stephens Cemetery, Est. 1864, Inc. v. Wilma Elizabeth TylerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
- Skaggs Regional Medical Center v. PowersMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- Continental Western Insurance Company v. ASAP Hauling LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2021
- Mark Kershaw v. City of Kansas City, MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.