Legal Opinion

People v. Page

California Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1897No. Crim. No. 189PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the' Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. William T. Wallace, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Belcher, C.

defendant was convicted of the crime of embezzlement, and has appealed from the order denying his motion for a new trial, and from the final judgment entered against him.

The indictment was filed May 29, 1895, and after stating the jurisdictional facts it charged that on or about the twenty-eighth day of May, 1895, the defendant, *390“ being then and there intrusted with and having in his control the sum of $4,362 in lawful money of the United States, .... as guardian, trustee, and agent of one Louis Lichtneger, an insane person, for the use and benefit of said Louis Lichtneger, then…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. NortheyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. People v. RoyceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. People v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. People v. TalbotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  2. People v. HatchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  3. People v. HatchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. People v. GordonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. People v. SchwarzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API