Legal Opinion
Pare v. Commonwealth
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided May 3, 1995PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAbrams, J.
A grand jury returned an indictment against David Pare (defendant) alleging two counts of indecent assault and battery on a child under fourteen years of age. The defendant sought discovery of privileged psychiatric records of the complaining witness. In seeking the privileged records, the defendant filed a motion asking for an ex parte hearing on the submission of his defense theory. See Commonwealth v. Bishop, 416 Mass. 169 (1993). The Superior Court judge denied the defendant’s motion for an ex parte hearing. The defendant filed a request for interlocutory relief under G. L. *217c. 21 i, § 3…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Borman v. BormanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Commonwealth v. BishopMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- Blaisdell v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Costarelli v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Gilday v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LampronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
- McMenimen v. PassatempoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
- Martin v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
- Commonwealth v. MitchellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
- Esteves v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.