Legal Opinion

McMenimen v. Passatempo

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided August 15, 2008PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Marshall, CJ.

This is an appeal from a judgment of a single justice of the county court denying a petition for extraordinary relief pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3. Because we conclude that the case does not present the type of exceptional circumstances that require the exercise of our general superintendence power, we affirm the judgment of the single justice.

*179Background. The case has an unnecessarily complicated and prolonged history, which we recite in some detail because it is relevant to our disposition. The case has its roots in a civil action that was commenced in the Superior Court in…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Jarosz v. PalmerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  2. Fabre v. WaltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  3. Rollins Environmental Services, Inc. v. Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  4. Brum v. Town of DartmouthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  5. Borman v. BormanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Passatempo v. McMenimenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
  2. Commonwealth v. GoodwinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  3. BirchallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  4. Commonwealth v. VacherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  5. Morrissey v. New England Deaconess Ass'n - Abundant Life Communities, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API