Legal Opinion

Ninth Street East, Ltd. v. Harrison

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 23, 1968No. File No. CV 1-679-14028PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorton M. Levine, J.

This is an action to recover the purchase price of merchandise sold to defendant by plaintiff. Plaintiff is a manufacturer of men’s clothing, with a principal place of business in L-os Angeles, California. Defendant is the owner and operator of a men’s clothing store, located in Westport, Connecticut, known as “The Rage.”

*598Pursuant to orders received by plaintiff in Los Angeles on November 28, 1966, defendant ordered a variety of clothing items from plaintiff. On November 30, 1966, plaintiff delivered the merchandise in Los Angeles to a common carrier known as Denver-Chicago Trucking Company,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gyro Brass Manufacturing Corp. v. United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
  2. Harvey Probber, Inc. v. KauffmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Illustrated Postal Card & Novelty Co. v. HoltSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
  4. Lewis v. ScovilleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
  5. Katz v. Delohery Hat Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Adsit Co., Inc. v. GustinIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. State v. CardwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  3. Automated Donut Systems, Inc. v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
  4. Met-Al, Inc. v. Hansen Storage Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1993
  5. Black Prince Distillery, Inc. v. Home LiquorsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API