Legal Opinion
Katz v. Delohery Hat Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 4, 1922PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
It will simplify the consideration of this case to deal first with the question whether the defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict as against the evidence was properly denied.
A review of the evidence discloses that there are certain undisputed facts in evidence, among them the following: The plaintiff was engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling fur for use in manufacturing hats. The defendant was a manufacturer of hats. The plaintiff made and sold one kind of fur which was designated by him as Y. C. Superior B. C. B. unpulled fur. This fur was cut from skins of rabbits…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dustan v. . McAndrewNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
- Plumb v. CurtisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
- Home Pattern Co. v. W. W. Mertz Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
- Mears v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902
- Friedler v. HekelerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Grant v. MichaelsMontana Supreme Court · 1933
- Berndston v. AnninoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Henry Glass & Co. v. MisrochNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Rogoff v. Southern New England Contractors Supply Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
- State v. KirkerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.