Legal Opinion
Gyro Brass Manufacturing Corp. v. United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers of America
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 23, 1959PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMellitz, J.
The plaintiff instituted this action to recover damages for losses allegedly sustained when it was required to close its plant as a result of unlawful interference with its right to obtain possession of certain goods required for the operation of its business. By way of counterclaim, the defendants sought damages for expenses incurred for counsel fees in resisting allegedly unlawful attempts by the plaintiff to obtain possession of the goods. The trial court found against the plaintiff on the complaint and against the defendants on the counterclaim, and all parties have appealed.
The plaintiff…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Allyn v. MatherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1832
- State v. TolisanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
- Blakeslee v. Board of Water CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- State v. CeseroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Engel v. ContiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- State v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. GraytonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- St. George Creaghe v. Iowa Home Mutual Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
- Rodgers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.