Legal Opinion

Met-Al, Inc. v. Hansen Storage Co.

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided August 19, 1993No. 93-C-479. Adv. No. 92-2304PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

WARREN, Senior District Judge.

The plaintiff in this adversary proceeding lost over $4 million when an unscrupulous aluminum broker set up phony transactions, diverted aluminum from the plaintiffs intended customers, and failed to pay for goods delivered. The plaintiff now claims that the carrier of the aluminum, and the warehouse in which it was stored, should be held liable for the loss based upon their failure to honor the original bills of lading. Before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for partial summary judgment.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Met>-Al, Inc. (“MeL-Al”) produces…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Charles E. Egger v. Harlan C. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  4. William Lee Howland v. William Kilquist and Gene TruittCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  5. Allied Chemical International Corp. v. Companhia De Navegacao Lloyd BrasileiroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. MermisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  2. State v. MermisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  3. United States v. $3,000 in CashDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995
  4. Vista Metals Corp. v. Metal Brokers International, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1993
  5. BII Finance Co. v. U-States Forwarding Services Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API