Legal Opinion
Stanford v. Ronald H. Mayer Real Estate, Inc.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided February 25, 1993No. 92CA0163PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge METZGER.
Plaintiffs, David Stanford and Robert Regester, appeal the judgment of the trial court which denied their request for a percentage of earnest money forfeited as liquidated damages pursuant to a real estate sales contract. We affirm.
The essential facts are not disputed. Defendant, Bogle Farms, Inc. (owner), entered into an exclusive listing agreement with the real estate brokerage firm of Ronald H. Mayer, defendant, whereby Mayer undertook to sell owner’s real property. The agreement provided in part that Mayer “agrees to work jointly with all licensed real estate…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Guy Martin Buick, Inc. v. Colorado Springs National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
- Scott v. HuntzingerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
- Mashburn v. WilsonColorado Court of Appeals · 1985
- P.J. Berry Co. v. Denver American Family Lodge West, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1983
- Ginsberg v. FrankenbergSupreme Court of Colorado · 1956
3Cited by9 opinions
- Dudding v. Norton Frickey & AssociatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Interbank Investments, LLC v. Eagle River Water & Sanitation DistrictColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
- Duncan v. Nissan N. Am., Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Falkenberg Capital Corp. v. Dakota Cellular, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1996
- Braddock Financial Corp. v. Washington Mutual BankDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.