Legal Opinion

Ginsberg v. Frankenberg

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 9, 1956No. 17724PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holland

Plaintiff in error as plaintiff on March 30, 1953, filed his complaint by which he sought to recover the sum of $1,425 with interest thereon, which he claimed as a commission due him as a licensed broker in connection with the sale of property located in Denver, Colorado, under a nonexclusive listing with defendant, the owner thereof. In due course defendant answered, generally denying that plaintiff had earned a commission and alleging facts in connection with the transaction, the material parts of which will be mentioned in our discussion, Other pleadings in the case are not consequential…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mapes v. City Council of City of WalsenburgColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Stanford v. Ronald H. Mayer Real Estate, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API