Legal Opinion
Falkenberg Capital Corp. v. Dakota Cellular, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided May 6, 1996No. Civil A. 95-351 MMSPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, Senior District Judge.
I. Introduction
Before the Court is a motion to dismiss, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), by defendant Dakota Cellular, Inc. (“Dakota”) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted (“Motion to Dismiss”). Docket Item (“D.I.”) 5. Plaintiff Falkenberg Capital Corporation (“Falken-berg”) has filed a complaint, D.I. 1, requesting relief for breach of contract or, alternatively, quantum meruit. The underlying dispute involves a listing agreement entered into by the parties on May 3, 1994, in which…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- North River Insurance Company v. Cigna Reinsurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Mellon Bank, N.A. v. Aetna Business Credit, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Tigg Corporation v. Dow Corning CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Pepcol Manufacturing Co. v. Denver Union Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Niedermeier v. Office of BaucusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- Hurley v. Columbia Casualty Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1997
- Six Flags, Inc. v. Parc Management, LLC (In Re Premier International Holdings, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2010
- Corrigan v. Methodist HospitalDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
- Marsh-Monsanto v. St. Thomas-St. John Board of ElectionsSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.