Legal Opinion
Nathan T. Meidl v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided January 25, 2013No. 11-90CPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
10 U.S.C. § 1201 (2006) (compensable disabilities); 10 U.S.C.A § 1216a(b) (2012) (medical conditions considered in disability determinations); Army Regulation 636-40 (physical evaluation for separation); 38 C.F.R. § 4.3 (resolving reasonable doubt in disability ratings); 38 C.F.R. § 4.7 (choosing between two disability evaluations); RCFC 52.1 (judgment on the administrative record); RCFC 62.2 (remanding to an administrative body).
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SUSAN G. BRADEN, Judge.
I. RELEVANT FACTS. 1
On September 8, 1993, Nathan T. Meidl (“Plaintiff’) enlisted in the Army Reserve Officers’…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ward v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Nathan T. Meidl v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Walker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Boyce v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2023
- Fuentes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.