Legal Opinion
Ward v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided July 31, 2017No. 12-435CPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND REMAND ORDER
WILLIAMS, Judge.
This military pay case comes before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for judgment on the Administrative Record (“AR”), Plaintiff, Matthew Ward, was medically discharged from the Army as . being unfit for duty due to severe gastroesophageal reflux and was not awarded disability benefits. Plaintiff claims the disorder was either incurred or permanently aggravated while he was on active duty and requests that the Court remand this matter to the Secretary of the Army with instructions to award Plaintiff a 50% disability rating effective July 4",…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- David W. Heisig v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Boyce v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2023
- Exnicios v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
- Fuentes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
- Gregory v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
- Keltner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2023
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.