Legal Opinion

Nathan T. Meidl v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided January 30, 2014No. 11-90CPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND FINAL ORDER

BRADEN, Judge.

I. RELEVANT FACTS. 1

On September 8, 1993, Nathan T. Meidl (“Plaintiff’) enlisted in the Army Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (“Army ROTC”) program while attending the University of Wisconsin. AR 209. On April 9,1996, Plaintiff entered active duty in the United States Army. AR 10, 194-204. On April 30, 2000, he was appointed as a commissioned officer in the Active Guard Reserve (“AGR”) program. AEt 167.

Later in 2000, while serving in the AGR, Plaintiff began to experience bilateral foot pain that was aggravated by prolonged standing and running.…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  5. Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hymas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  2. Stein v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  3. Gay v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  4. Martin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API