Legal Opinion
In re Zoning Variance Application of Ray Reilly Tire Mart, Inc.
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided June 8, 1982No. 342-81PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeck, J.
This appeal challenges the Rutland Superior Court’s determination that the appellee, Ray Reilly Tire Mart, Inc., satisfied the five criteria set forth in 24 V.S.A. § 4468 (a) for obtaining a variance.
The appellee has owned a piece of commercial property lying on the north side of Woodstock Avenue in the City of Rutland, Vermont, since 1957. On this property the appellee conducts wholesale and retail sales and service permitted by city zoning regulations. In 1978 the appellee purchased from the City of Rutland a small triangular piece of property lying north of and contiguous to the north…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gadhue v. MarcotteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
- W. R. Sorg & North Hero House, Inc. v. North Hero Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977
- Griffin Const. Corp. v. Bd. of Adjust. of TeaneckNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
- Lewis v. PickeringSupreme Court of Vermont · 1975
3Cited by17 opinions
- In re Appeal of MutschlerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
- Application of McDonald's Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1989
- Blow v. Town of Berlin Zoning AdministratorSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
- In Re Cumberland Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1989
- Appeal of Audet Mgmt., AssociationVermont Superior Court · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.