Legal Opinion
Griffin Const. Corp. v. Bd. of Adjust. of Teaneck
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided December 2, 1964PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
85 N.J. Super. 472 (1964)
205 A.2d 313
GRIFFIN CONSTRUCTION CORP., ETC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE TOWNSHIP OF TEANECK AND WILLIAM DUNLOP, BUILDING INSPECTOR, ETC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued November 2, 1964.
Decided December 2, 1964.
Before Judges CONFORD, KILKENNY and LEWIS.
Mr. David B. Follender argued the cause for appellant.
Mr. Jacob Schneider argued the cause for respondents.
The opinion of the court was delivered by CONFORD, S.J.A.D.
This is another in the series of cases before our courts in recent years…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lumund v. Bd. of Adjustment of the Borough of RutherfordSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Ardolino v. Florham Park Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Beirn v. MorrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Wilson v. Borough of MountainsideSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- Home Builders Ass'n of Northern NJ v. PARAMUS BOR.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Stansbury v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Gougeon v. BOROUGH OF STONE HARBORSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
- In re Zoning Variance Application of Ray Reilly Tire Mart, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1982
- Bove v. Bd. of Adjust. of Emerson BoroughNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- Pagano v. Zoning Bd. of AdjustmentNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.