Legal Opinion
Blow v. Town of Berlin Zoning Administrator
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided April 7, 1989No. 87-155PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.
Plaintiff, lot owner, appeals from a superior court judgment affirming the denial by the Berlin Zoning Board of Adjustment of a variance from the front and rear setback requirements of the Berlin zoning ordinance. We affirm.
According to the facts stipulated in the superior court, applicant acquired a building lot on the Barre-Montpelier Road in Berlin in 1970 (Lot A) prior to the Town’s adoption of a zoning ordinance, and acquired a second, contiguous lot in 1981 (Lot B), following adoption of zoning by the Town. He proposed to erect a commercial buiding on Lot A, with parking on Lot B.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re PooleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1978
- L. M. Pike & Son, Inc. v. Town of WaterfordSupreme Court of Vermont · 1972
- Application of McDonald's Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1989
- Gadhue v. MarcotteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
- In re Zoning Variance Application of Ray Reilly Tire Mart, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- In Re DunnettSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
- Kashner v. Greensboro Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
- Appeal of Audet Mgmt., AssociationVermont Superior Court · 2000
- Appeal of BachelderVermont Superior Court · 2000
- Appeal of Gardner Construction, Inc.Vermont Superior Court · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.