In re Appeal of Mutschler
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1. The Vermont Environmental Court granted applicant a variance from setback requirements for a proposed commercial building on an existing small lot. Neighboring landowners appeal, arguing that the court misapplied 24 V.S.A. § 4468(a)(5)1 by granting a variance that does not represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and the least deviation possible from the applicable zoning bylaws and the town plan. We agree and reverse.
¶ 2. Applicant is a contractor seeking to relocate his contracting business from Massachusetts to the Town of Burke, Vermont. He currently maintains a home *502in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Fordham Manor Reformed Church v. WalshNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Lubinsky v. Fair Haven Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986
- Matthew v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
- Dewitt v. Town of Brattleboro Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Vermont · 1970
- L. M. Pike & Son, Inc. v. Town of WaterfordSupreme Court of Vermont · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- In Re Ranney Dairy Farm, LLC Major Subdivision Appeal-Westminster DRB Permit No. 21-70 (Daniel Deitz, Appellants)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2024
- 316 Main St. LLCVermont Superior Court · 2012
- 600 Waits River Road Zoning Permit Application - Decision on MeritsVermont Superior Court · 2025
- Appeal of Van NostrandVermont Superior Court · 2009
- Barth Variance ApplicationVermont Superior Court · 2008
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.