Legal Opinion

In re Appeal of Mutschler

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 25, 2006No. 04-457PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1. The Vermont Environmental Court granted applicant a variance from setback requirements for a proposed commercial building on an existing small lot. Neighboring landowners appeal, arguing that the court misapplied 24 V.S.A. § 4468(a)(5)1 by granting a variance that does not represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and the least deviation possible from the applicable zoning bylaws and the town plan. We agree and reverse.

¶ 2. Applicant is a contractor seeking to relocate his contracting business from Massachusetts to the Town of Burke, Vermont. He currently maintains a home *502in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Fordham Manor Reformed Church v. WalshNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. Lubinsky v. Fair Haven Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986
  3. Matthew v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  4. Dewitt v. Town of Brattleboro Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Vermont · 1970
  5. L. M. Pike & Son, Inc. v. Town of WaterfordSupreme Court of Vermont · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. In Re Ranney Dairy Farm, LLC Major Subdivision Appeal-Westminster DRB Permit No. 21-70 (Daniel Deitz, Appellants)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2024
  2. 316 Main St. LLCVermont Superior Court · 2012
  3. 600 Waits River Road Zoning Permit Application - Decision on MeritsVermont Superior Court · 2025
  4. Appeal of Van NostrandVermont Superior Court · 2009
  5. Barth Variance ApplicationVermont Superior Court · 2008

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API