Legal Opinion

People v. Hughes

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 13, 1926No. Docket No. 1323PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.

The appellant was convicted upon an information filed by the district attorney of Los Angeles County charging that “the said T. C. Hughes . . . was the agent and bailee of Prank Powell, . . . and then and there by virtue of his trust as sueh agent and bailey came into the care, possession, custody and control of him, the said T. C. Hughes one trust deed of the value of twenty-five hundred dollars ($2500.00) . . . And he, the said T. C. Hughes, after the said personal property of the value aforesaid had come into his possession, custody, care and control, as aforesaid, . . . did then and there…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Agar v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Commonwealth v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  3. People v. ConboyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  4. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
  5. State v. LewisWashington Supreme Court · 1903

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CarsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  2. People v. RolandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. People v. CoyleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. Territory of Hawaii v. YoonHawaii Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API