Legal Opinion

People v. Coyle

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 10, 1927No. Docket No. 1443PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McLUCAS, J., pro tem.

The information is in eight counts, four of which charged the defendant with the crime of grand larceny of certain stocks, and the other four counts charged the defendant with the crime of embezzlement of the identical stocks mentioned in the larceny counts. The jury returned a verdict acquitting the defendant on the four counts charging grand larceny, and finding the defendant guilty on the four counts charging embezzlement. The trial court pronounced judgment and sentenced the defendant on count VIII, while sentence was suspended on counts II, IV, and VI. Defendant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. SelbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Agar v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  3. State v. BaumhagerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  4. People v. BorchersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  5. United States v. SanderU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1855

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. McMonigleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. People v. MeyersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. Territory of Hawaii v. YoonHawaii Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API