Legal Opinion

People v. Conboy

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 20, 1910No. Crim. No. 268PublishedCited by 31 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Frank H. Dunne, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.

The defendant was informed against for. the crime of murder. He was tried and convicted of manslaughter. Thereupon he moved for a new trial, which was denied, and he was thereupon sentenced to serve a term of seven years in the state prison. This appeal is prosecuted from the judgment.

After the jury had been deliberating upon their verdict for seven and one-half hours, they returned into court at 11:30 P. M. and requested further instructions. In complying with this request the trial judge concluded the charge with the following remarks: “Now, gentlemen, I think I have read to you about all…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McMinn v. WhelanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  2. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Hair v. LittleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1856
  4. People v. KindlebergerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. People v. CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. People v. MontalvoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. People v. TalkingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. People v. CrowleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. People v. FrankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API