Legal Opinion

Smathers v. Western Carolina Bank

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 24, 1911PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from GounciTl, J., at the Fall Term, 1910, of BuNCOMBE.

1Opinion of the Court

Clark, O. J.

This action was begun against the Western Carolina Bank, which was chartered by the State, for a receiver, and to wind up the affairs of the bank, which had become insolvent. The present plaintiff, receiver of the bank, appealed from so much of the judgment as adjudged that Lauretta‘Maddux and L. P. McLoud were not liable to the creditors for double the amount of their stock, as provided by the statute (chapter 298, Public Laws .1897), by reason of the fact that they were married women. The administrator of Lewis Maddux appealed from the ruling of the court that his estate was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bernheimer v. ConverseSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Scott v. LatimerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
  3. Smathers v. Bank.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  4. Hanover National Bank v. CockeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  5. Witters v. SowlesUnited States Circuit Court · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bryan v. BullockSupreme Court of Florida · 1922
  2. American Trust Co. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  3. Hood Ex Rel. North Carolina Bank & Trust Co. v. North Carolina Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  4. Squire, Supt. v. Standen, Gdn.Ohio Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Alexander v. DeverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API