Legal Opinion

State v. Ferguson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 3, 2010No. A10-540PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUDSON, Judge.

On appeal following remand by this court for resentencing, appellant challenges his criminal-history score and argues that the district court erred by failing to impose sentence only on the most serious conviction arising out of a single behavioral incident. Because appellant may be sentenced only on his conviction of drive-by shooting toward an occupied building, we reverse and remand.

FACTS

The facts of this case are described in detail in State v. Ferguson, No. A08-1327, 2009 WL 3172139 (Minn.App. Oct. 6, 2009). Briefly, appellant Michael Ferguson sat in the front…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bangert v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. State v. MaurstadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  3. State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  4. State v. MarquardtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  5. State v. KebasoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. FergusonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  2. State v. FergusonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API