State v. Ferguson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUDSON, Judge.
On appeal following remand by this court for resentencing, appellant challenges his criminal-history score and argues that the district court erred by failing to impose sentence only on the most serious conviction arising out of a single behavioral incident. Because appellant may be sentenced only on his conviction of drive-by shooting toward an occupied building, we reverse and remand.
FACTS
The facts of this case are described in detail in State v. Ferguson, No. A08-1327, 2009 WL 3172139 (Minn.App. Oct. 6, 2009). Briefly, appellant Michael Ferguson sat in the front…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bangert v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- State v. MaurstadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- State v. MarquardtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. KebasoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. FergusonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- State v. FergusonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012