State v. Ferguson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Dissent
ANDERSON, PAUL H., Justice
(dissenting).
I respectfully dissent. I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that a drive-by shooting at an occupied building is a victimless crime; rather, I conclude that all of the occupants of the targeted building are victims. Moreover, even if the majority is correct that the building’s occupants were not victims, I disagree with the majority’s assumption that the multiple-victim exception applies to a victimless crime. It does not. Therefore, I would affirm the result reached by the court of appeals.
Michael James Ferguson was convicted on one count of aiding…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. WhittakerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- State v. BookwalterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- State v. HerbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- State Ex Rel. Stangvik v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.