State v. Hurt
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EDMUNDS, Justice.
In our reconsideration of this matter, we limit our review to the sentencing procedure followed by the trial court. When defendant entered a plea of guilty to second-degree murder, his attorney argued that the court should find certain mitigating factors and reject aggravating factors proposed by the State. The trial court imposed an aggravated sentence without submitting the aggravating factors to the jury. Because we hold that the arguments of defendant’s counsel in mitigation did not constitute an admission that the offense was especially heinous, atrocious, or cruel, the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Washington v. RecuencoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- State v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- State v. LasiterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
- State v. EveretteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
- State v. HurtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- State v. CoffeyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- Boone Ford, Inc. v. IME Scheduler, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.