Legal Opinion

Melhorn v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 30, 2005PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge COHN JUBELIRER.

Barry Melhorn petitions for review of an order of the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (Board) that denied his request for administrative relief. Melhorn was confined for 5 months, 10 days, because of a Board detainer and a new criminal charge on which he did not post bail. He pled guilty and was sentenced on the new criminal charge. The trial court’s sentencing order did not permit the time he spent in custody prior to his sentencing to be credited to his new sentence; consequently, Melhorn asserts that it should be credited to the backtime on his…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gaito v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Martin v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. McCray v. Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Commonwealth v. BigleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Armbruster v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Smith, D. v. PA Board of Probation & Parole, Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Com. of Pa. v. GibbsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. Koehler v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Bowman v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API